I'd like the community's thoughts on the channel question primarily, but if you had any ideas on the issue as a whole, I would gladly welcome the input. One is to keep the transmit frequencies separated (1,6,11) and another thought is to have them on on the same channel as long as they can 'see' each other (channel 6 with enough transmit power to overlap). I've heard two different thoughts on WAPs. When the connection drops, it drops the connection to the server but is still connected to the WAP. We have run WireShark captures and matched to TCP dumps from the EMR server to each laptop with no logical issue realized. I've been working on segregating the channels to three choices (1, 6, 11) and turning the transmit power down to limit the range from other WAPs in the facility.Īt first this seemed to help, but now we are still experiencing the same problems. When I first worked on this problem, I discovered the WAPs had a lot of co-channel interference. The problem is that the laptops drop the connection to the EMR server many times a day. They connect to the EMR system to document the patient visit among other things. They connect wirelessly to two WAPs mounting just above the drop-down ceiling in the rehab room. These karts have Fujitsu laptops (I know, I know) that are about 5 years old. The situation is this, we have five roll around carts for therapists to use while they are tending to a patient in the rehab department. I am attempting to correct some wi-fi problems I ma having in our company.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |